Most of us have a cleanup instinct when it comes to the spiritual life. A retreat, a good confession, a Lenten resolution, a fresh start on the first Monday of the year, and the spiritual house gets swept clean. Bad habits go out the door. The calendar gets rearranged around Mass and a little prayer time. It feels like conversion, and sometimes it is true conversion. But Jesus tells a story today about a man whose house got exactly that treatment and who ended up worse off than before. The unclean spirit left him, wandered the desert, came back, and found the place “swept and put in order.” Clean, tidy, and empty. So it moved back in, with seven friends.
That’s the layer underneath our cleanups. We’d like to be good without belonging to anyone. A swept house with nobody living in it is still on the market waiting for a buyer. The first reading names the same trap from the other side. Paul tells the Galatians that anyone who stands before God on his own performance lives “under a curse,” and that the only way out was for Christ to step into the curse himself, so that the blessing promised to Abraham could reach the nations and “we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.”
Today the Church may keep the optional memorial of Saint Denis and his companions. Denis was sent from Rome to the Gentiles of Gaul and is remembered as the first bishop of Paris. Tradition says he died on the hill now called Montmartre (mohn-MAR-truh), the mountain of martyrs. He knew whose house he was, who dwelled within him. Here’s the question these readings put to you and me: we’ve swept the house, but who lives in it?
The Readings
First Reading: Galatians 3:7-14
So you see that it is men of faith who are the sons of Abraham. And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, “In you shall all the nations be blessed.” So then, those who are men of faith are blessed with Abraham who had faith.
For all who rely on works of the law are under a curse; for it is written, “Cursed be every one who does not abide by all things written in the book of the law, and do them.” Now it is evident that no man is justified before God by the law; for “He who through faith is righteous shall live”; but the law does not rest on faith, for “He who does them shall live by them.” Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us—for it is written, “Cursed be every one who hangs on a tree”—that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.
Gospel: Luke 11:15-26
But some of them said, “He casts out demons by Be-el′zebul, the prince of demons”; while others, to test him, sought from him a sign from heaven. But he, knowing their thoughts, said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and house falls upon house. And if Satan also is divided against himself, how will his kingdom stand? For you say that I cast out demons by Be-el′zebul. And if I cast out demons by Be-el′zebul, by whom do your sons cast them out? Therefore they shall be your judges. But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you. When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his goods are in peace; but when one stronger than he assails him and overcomes him, he takes away his armor in which he trusted, and divides his spoil. He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters.
“When the unclean spirit has gone out of a man, he passes through waterless places seeking rest; and finding none he says, ‘I will return to my house from which I came.’ And when he comes he finds it swept and put in order. Then he goes and brings seven other spirits more evil than himself, and they enter and dwell there; and the last state of that man becomes worse than the first.”
Scriptural Analysis
Yesterday Paul asked the Galatians whether they had received the Spirit “by works of the law, or by hearing with faith” (Galatians 3:2). Today he opens the Scriptures to prove his point. Cardinal Albert Vanhoye and Peter Williamson say the subject never changes: faith and law, and which one a person placed their trust in before God. “One can seek to base one’s relationship with God on either faith or law, but not both.” The Galatians had been told that to become Abraham’s children they needed circumcision and the whole Mosaic law. Paul answers that “it is men of faith who are the sons of Abraham,” and quotes the first promise in Abraham’s story, “In you shall all the nations be blessed” (Genesis 12:3). The nations are the Gentiles, the Galatians themselves. Vanhoye and Williamson present the literal sense of verse 8: “God evangelized Abraham in advance.”1
Then verse 10 turns from blessing to curse: “all who rely on works of the law are under a curse.” Frank Matera notes that Paul is quoting the last of twelve curses from a covenant ceremony on entering the Promised Land, each one answered by the people’s “Amen” (Deuteronomy 27:14-26). Vanhoye and Williamson notice how carefully Paul words it. The law promises blessings to those who keep it (Deuteronomy 28:1-13), and Paul leaves that intact. Those who rely on works of the law are “under a curse,” living within its reach, because the text demands “all things written.” The question underneath, they say, is where a person starts: “From what, or on what basis, do I seek to be accepted by God?”2
Verses 11 and 12 set two Old Testament sentences side by side, both built on the words “shall live.” Habakkuk says, “He who through faith is righteous shall live” (Habakkuk 2:4). Leviticus says, “He who does them shall live by them” (Leviticus 18:5). One roots life in trust and the other roots life in performance. Vanhoye and Williamson call the system of performance “intrinsically defective because it confines human beings within the limits of their own striving.”3
Then, verse 13, the sentence the whole passage turns on: “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us.” The verb is exagorazō (ex-ah-go-RAH-zoh), and Vanhoye and Williamson point out that it comes from the marketplace, where it meant to buy back. His proof text, Deuteronomy 21:23, concerns the corpse of an executed criminal hung on a tree, and Matera says that by New Testament times the phrase meant crucifixion (Acts 5:30). Paul makes a quiet edit. The Hebrew text speaks of a curse “of God,” and the Greek Septuagint says “cursed by God.” Paul leaves out both. Vanhoye and Williamson explain why: externally Christ became “a curse,” but “at the deepest level he was more than ever the Son united to the Father in obedience and love.” Matera calls it “a divine interchange: Christ assumes humanity’s situation so that humanity can assume his situation.”4
Saint Thomas Aquinas notices that Paul writes “a curse” where he could have written “accursed,” and he draws out the force of this word choice: Christ “was made curse itself.” Then Thomas reads verse 14 as holding the key to all of it. Christ became a curse “to enable the Gentiles, who were not under the curse of the law, to receive the blessing promised to Abraham.” This blessing is not generic: it has a name: “that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.” The Catechism counts “the Spirit of the promise” among the titles Saint Paul gives the Holy Spirit, citing this very verse. Thomas explains why the Spirit and the blessing belong together: “For it is through the Spirit that we are joined to Christ and become children of Abraham, worthy of the blessing.”5 Keep that in mind, because the Gospel is about the Spirit as well, and about whose house we are.
Yesterday’s Gospel ended with Jesus promising that the Father will “give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him” (Luke 11:13). Today’s begins with a man set free from a demon, and the Lectionary picks up with the story already in progress: the demon was mute, and when it left, the man finally spoke (Luke 11:14). Pablo Gadenz notes that Luke tells the miracle briefly and spends his attention on the argument that follows. Some say Jesus casts out demons by Beelzebul (bee-EL-zeh-bool). Gadenz explains the name as something like “master of the exalted house,” from Baal (BAH-al), “master” or “lord,” and zebul (zeh-BOOL), an exalted dwelling.6 Notice the prominence of the house in Luke’s presentation. The whole Gospel is about who lives in one.
Others “sought from him a sign from heaven.” Luke Timothy Johnson catches the irony. Testing is the devil’s own work (Luke 4:2), and “the last ‘sign from heaven’ that we heard of in the narrative was that of Satan’s falling ‘like lightning out of heaven’” (Luke 10:18).7 The sign they demand is standing in front of them.
Jesus answers with common sense. A kingdom at war with itself falls, and Satan has no interest in evicting his own tenants. Then he states the truth outright: “But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.” Both commentators hear the Exodus, where Pharaoh’s magicians, beaten by the third plague, said, “This is the finger of God” (Exodus 8:19). Johnson calls it “another Lukan allusion to Jesus as the prophet like Moses.”8 Matthew has “by the Spirit of God” (Matthew 12:28). Saint Augustine, in the Catena Aurea (kah-TAY-nah OW-ray-ah) of Saint Thomas, says the difference teaches us how to read the phrase: “the Holy Spirit is called the finger of God, because of the distribution of gifts which are given through Him.” The Catechism lists the finger among the symbols of the Holy Spirit and recalls that the hymn Veni Creator Spiritus (VEH-nee kreh-AH-tor SPEE-ree-toos) calls him the “finger of the Father’s right hand.”9
Jesus then presents a short parable about a strong man guarding his palace and “one stronger than he” who overcomes him. Gadenz points out that John the Baptist had already used the same word for Jesus, “he who is mightier than I” (Luke 3:16), and that the picture fulfills Isaiah, where the Servant will “divide the spoil with the strong” (Isaiah 53:12). Saint John Chrysostom, in the Catena, says the devil’s strength comes from “his ancient dominion, of which our weakness was the cause.” Saint Bede says the spoils are “the men themselves, who have been deceived by him.”10 Johnson’s translation says the strong man “relied” on his armor, and he presses on the word: the strong man “had ‘relied’ on his possessions, but they needed his protection to be safe!”11 Set that beside Paul. A man who relies on works of the law is guarding his own palace, and the armor he trusts in can be stripped off in an afternoon.
“He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters.” Gadenz says a choice is set before the listeners: “a person cannot remain neutral but must either stand with or against him.”12
Then the story takes an interesting turn: the spirit that comes back finds its old house “swept and put in order” and brings seven others worse than itself. Johnson can’t read it without picturing a lodger evicted for not paying rent, who returns to find the building clean and empty and moves in with his seediest friends. Then he states the lesson: “One must choose between kingdoms. It is the empty tenement that invites squatters.” Gadenz reaches the same conclusion from the verse just before, the Father’s gift of the Spirit: “If ‘the Spirit of God dwells in’ a person (1 Cor 3:16), there will be no room for evil spirits to dwell there.”13 Saint Bede, in the Catena, applies the story to the baptized. The house was swept, “purified by the grace of baptism from the stain of sin, yet replenished with no diligence in good works.”14
Put the two readings side by side, and they tell one story. Paul says a man who leans on his own performance is guarding his own house, and the curse waits at the door. Jesus says a house swept clean and left empty is an open invitation. Both point to the same answer. The stronger one has come. He went into the strong man’s house by going under the curse himself, on a tree, and he came out carrying the spoil, which is us. And the blessing he won for the nations is the Spirit, the finger of God, who means to move in and stay.
Daily Application
The interior movement these readings ask for is straightforward. We must give our house an owner. Most of us know how to sweep out our house and keep it clean. We confess, we resolve, we tidy up the schedule. Then we live in the clean house as though it were ours to keep, defended by our own good habits. Vanhoye and Williamson describe the trap bluntly: “We think that our self-discipline, our good habits, our devotional practices, and our determination to keep God’s law will see us through.” Then they name the real choice: “human beings must choose between pride and love.”15 A house kept clean by pride is still empty, and Jesus says empty houses get visitors.
So when you sweep, invite the owner in. After your next confession, take 10 minutes of the thanksgiving that most of us skip and ask the Holy Spirit, by name, to take possession of what was just cleaned. Bede’s warning is worth carrying out of the confessional: beware “lest the sin which we supposed extinguished in us, by our neglect overcome us unawares.” The remedy is occupancy. Saint Ambrose says that “we in whom the Spirit dwells are a royal house.”16 Furnish it the way a king’s house is furnished: daily prayer, the Eucharist, a work of mercy this week that costs you something.
And when you fall, which you will, try the prayer Vanhoye and Williamson recommend for that exact moment. Getting angry with yourself is the spontaneous reaction, and they say plainly that it doesn’t help. Say this instead: “I did not rely sufficiently on you, and this is why I fell. I want to take the occasion of this fall to trust in you and not in myself.”17 That’s Galatians 3 on your knees. The man who relies on himself lives under the curse. The man who turns his failure into trust in God is standing where Abraham stood. We must choose where we want to stand.
Last, quit trying to stay neutral. “He who is not with me is against me.” Plenty of us live as polite fence-sitters: Catholic at Mass, unaffiliated at work, careful never to be counted on either side when it costs anything. Saint Denis couldn’t live that way. Franciscan Media says the best hypothesis holds that he was sent to Gaul from Rome in the third century and beheaded in the persecution of 258. Almost nothing else is known about him. Its reflection draws the right conclusion from that silence: a great man gave his life for Christ, and the Church has never forgotten him, “a human symbol of God’s eternal mindfulness.”18 Denis is the blessing of Abraham reaching the nations, carried by a man who knew whose house he was.
Let the stronger one in. Sweep the house, hand him the keys, and gather with him today.
Preparing for Sunday
This reflection is part of the daily readings. Every week I also write a full prep guide for the coming Sunday: all four readings in full, the Fathers, Aquinas and the Catechism cited properly, and three developed themes worked out at length.
I’m a permanent deacon and I write it because I need it myself. You don’t have to preach to use it.
Notes
- ↑ Albert Vanhoye and Peter S. Williamson, Galatians, Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2019), 105, 108.
- ↑ Frank J. Matera, Galatians, Sacra Pagina 9 (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1992), 119; Vanhoye and Williamson, Galatians, 109.
- ↑ Vanhoye and Williamson, Galatians, 110-111.
- ↑ Vanhoye and Williamson, Galatians, 111-112; Matera, Galatians, 120.
- ↑ Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Galatians, chap. 3, lect. 5, nos. 148, 151, at aquinas.cc; Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed. (Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1997), no. 693.
- ↑ Pablo T. Gadenz, The Gospel of Luke, Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2018), 225-226.
- ↑ Luke Timothy Johnson, The Gospel of Luke, Sacra Pagina 3 (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1991), 182.
- ↑ Johnson, Gospel of Luke, 181; Gadenz, Gospel of Luke, 226.
- ↑ Saint Augustine, Quaestiones Evangeliorum 2.17, quoted in Thomas Aquinas, Catena Aurea: Commentary on the Four Gospels, Collected out of the Works of the Fathers, vol. 3, St. Luke (Oxford: John Henry Parker, 1843), on Luke 11:17-20; Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 700.
- ↑ Gadenz, Gospel of Luke, 226; Saint John Chrysostom, Homily 41 on Matthew, and Saint Bede, quoted in Aquinas, Catena Aurea, vol. 3, St. Luke, on Luke 11:21-23.
- ↑ Johnson, Gospel of Luke, 183.
- ↑ Gadenz, Gospel of Luke, 226.
- ↑ Johnson, Gospel of Luke, 184; Gadenz, Gospel of Luke, 227.
- ↑ Saint Bede, quoted in Aquinas, Catena Aurea, vol. 3, St. Luke, on Luke 11:24-26.
- ↑ Vanhoye and Williamson, Galatians, 113.
- ↑ Saint Bede, quoted in Aquinas, Catena Aurea, vol. 3, St. Luke, on Luke 11:24-26; Saint Ambrose, quoted in Aquinas, Catena Aurea, vol. 3, St. Luke, on Luke 11:17-20.
- ↑ Vanhoye and Williamson, Galatians, 113.
- ↑ “Saint Denis and Companions,” Saint of the Day, Franciscan Media, accessed October 5, 2026, franciscanmedia.org.
Books Cited
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
- Albert Vanhoye and Peter S. Williamson, Galatians, Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture (Baker Academic, 2019)
- Frank J. Matera, Galatians, Sacra Pagina 9 (Liturgical Press, 1992)
- Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed. (Doubleday / Image)
- Pablo T. Gadenz, The Gospel of Luke, Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture (Baker Academic, 2018)
- Luke Timothy Johnson, The Gospel of Luke, Sacra Pagina 3 (Liturgical Press, 1991)
- Thomas Aquinas, Catena Aurea: Commentary on the Four Gospels (Baronius Press)


After your last fresh start, what did you fill the clean house with?